berlinkoop

One Australian company has prevented personnel from using the technology, others are scrambling for guidance on its cybersecurity implications - while federal government ministers are urging caution.

But others have actually welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in developing powerful yet less energy-intensive AI innovation.

In the days considering that the Chinese company launched its R1 synthetic intelligence design and publicly launched its and app, it has upended the AI market.

- Register for Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several global industry leaders saw their market worths drop after the launch, as DeepSeek showed AI might be established using a portion of the cost and processing required to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival might signal a new industry shift, but for government and service, king-wifi.win the result is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught federal governments and organizations by surprise as staff started to check out the new AI innovation, a minimum of for the arrival of Deepseek, some had a playbook.

Business as normal

A representative for Telstra said the company had "a strenuous process to evaluate all AI tools, capabilities, and utilize cases in our service", including a list of authorized generative AI tools, and standards on how to use them.

For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not authorized and its usage is not encouraged (although it's not officially obstructed).

"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our employees."

Other companies sought instant suggestions on whether DeepSeek must be embraced.

Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, said clients had actually currently approached the company for suggestions on whether the technology was safe.

"That's no surprise, because it seems the entire world has been in a little bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the economically and market inclined and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and federal government

CyberCX this week took the uncommon action of quickly releasing recommendations suggesting organisations, including government departments and those storing sensitive info, highly think about restricting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We know that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We've been down this roadway in the past," Mansted said. "We have actually had arguments about TikTok, about Chinese monitoring cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we constantly act after the truth, not before the truth ... Here, especially because the hazards are around compromise of sensitive details, in regards to any information that you take into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We thought we required to act faster this time."

Under federal AI policy carried out in September 2024, agencies have until completion of February 2025 to publish openness documents about their use of AI.

But understanding who makes choices on the specific usage of DeepSeek in the federal government has shown tricky. The chief law officer's department, that made the decision to prohibit TikTok use on government gadgets, referred queries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not supply a reaction by the time of publication.

Familiar disputes ...

Some of the reaction in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have been calls to prohibit the technology, in the middle of concern over how the Chinese government might access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the dispute over prohibiting TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, said today that Australia "can not continue the existing approach of reacting to each new tech development". It required a tech method covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI capabilities.

The industry minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was prematurely to make a choice on whether DeepSeek was a security risk.

Register to Breaking News Australia

Get the most crucial news as it breaks

"If there is anything that provides a danger in the national interest, prawattasao.awardspace.info we will constantly keep an open mind and enjoy what occurs. I believe it's too early to jump to conclusions on that," he said. "But, once again, if we have to act, then accountable governments do."

He worried that Australia is "in the last phases" of preparing its response and would develop its own regulative settings.

"The US is flagging their method. The EU has theirs. Canada likewise will have a different approach. And our local partners as well are looking at this," he said.