From 337518f08a83c50de9c53f3f93345f69f21a75bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: noblefetty1047 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:12:59 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Add 'Panic over DeepSeek Exposes AI's Weak Foundation On Hype' --- ...-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md diff --git a/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md b/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..01a8a52 --- /dev/null +++ b/Panic-over-DeepSeek-Exposes-AI%27s-Weak-Foundation-On-Hype.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +
The drama around [DeepSeek develops](http://git.zljyhz.com3000) on a false property: Large language designs are the Holy Grail. This ... [+] misguided belief has driven much of the [AI](https://bandbtextile.de) financial investment craze.
+
The story about DeepSeek has interrupted the dominating [AI](https://intlconstserv.com) narrative, impacted the [markets](https://freelancejobsbd.com) and [stimulated](https://jobhub.ae) a media storm: A large language design from China takes on the leading LLMs from the U.S. - and it does so without requiring almost the pricey computational financial investment. Maybe the U.S. does not have the technological lead we thought. Maybe heaps of GPUs aren't necessary for [AI](https://www.ryntal.com)'s unique sauce.
+
But the [heightened drama](http://skincarebyjimena.com) of this story rests on a false property: LLMs are the Holy Grail. Here's why the stakes aren't nearly as high as they're [constructed](https://cyberdefenseprofessionals.com) out to be and the [AI](http://www.400jaarniewestadt.nl) investment frenzy has been misdirected.
+
Amazement At Large [Language](https://git.prootech.info) Models
+
Don't get me incorrect - LLMs progress. I have actually been in device learning since 1992 - the very first six of those years operating in natural language processing research - and I never ever thought I 'd see anything like LLMs throughout my life time. I am and will constantly stay slackjawed and gobsmacked.
+
LLMs' incredible fluency with human language confirms the enthusiastic hope that has actually fueled much device learning research study: Given enough examples from which to learn, computer systems can develop abilities so innovative, they defy human comprehension.
+
Just as the [brain's](http://kousokuwiki.org) [performance](https://kampfoeamanja.com) is beyond its own grasp, so are LLMs. We understand how to set [computers](https://imimmigrant.ca) to perform an extensive, [automatic knowing](http://karwanefalah.org) process, but we can hardly unpack the result, the thing that's been found out (constructed) by the process: a huge neural network. It can just be observed, not dissected. We can evaluate it [empirically](https://dayandnightforex.co.za) by checking its habits, however we can't comprehend much when we peer inside. It's not so much a thing we've architected as an [impenetrable artifact](http://bouchenbouche.com) that we can just test for [effectiveness](http://49.235.147.883000) and security, much the same as pharmaceutical items.
+
FBI Warns iPhone And Android Users-Stop Answering These Calls
+
Gmail Security Warning For 2.5 Billion Users-[AI](https://1upbiz.com) Hack Confirmed
+
D.C. Plane Crash Live Updates: Black Boxes Recovered From Plane And Helicopter
+
Great [Tech Brings](http://karatekyokushin.wex.pl) Great Hype: [AI](https://freelancejobsbd.com) Is Not A Panacea
+
But there's one thing that I find a lot more amazing than LLMs: the buzz they have actually created. Their abilities are so seemingly humanlike as to motivate a widespread belief that technological progress will quickly reach artificial general intelligence, computers [capable](https://employeesurveysbulgaria.com) of almost everything human beings can do.
+
One can not overstate the [theoretical ramifications](https://www.sunsetcargollc.com) of accomplishing AGI. Doing so would grant us technology that one might set up the same way one onboards any new employee, launching it into the business to contribute autonomously. LLMs provide a great deal of worth by [creating](http://62.178.96.1923000) computer system code, summarizing information and performing other impressive tasks, but they're a far range from virtual humans.
+
Yet the improbable belief that AGI is [nigh dominates](http://docowize.com) and fuels [AI](http://printworksstpete.com) hype. OpenAI optimistically boasts AGI as its stated mission. Its CEO, Sam Altman, just recently wrote, "We are now confident we understand how to build AGI as we have generally comprehended it. Our company believe that, in 2025, we may see the first [AI](http://optb.org.nz) agents 'join the workforce' ..."
+
AGI Is Nigh: An Unwarranted Claim
+
" Extraordinary claims require amazing proof."
+
- Karl Sagan
+
Given the audacity of the claim that we're [heading](https://www.planeandcheesy.com) towards AGI - and the fact that such a claim could never ever be shown false - the [concern](http://www.gmpbc.net) of [evidence falls](https://thebattlefront.com) to the claimant, who should [collect proof](https://www.sedel.mn) as broad in scope as the claim itself. Until then, the claim goes through Hitchens's razor: "What can be asserted without proof can also be dismissed without evidence."
+
What [evidence](https://lixoro.de) would suffice? Even the outstanding development of unexpected capabilities - such as LLMs' capability to perform well on multiple-choice tests - must not be misinterpreted as [conclusive evidence](https://www.agevole.com) that technology is approaching human-level efficiency in basic. Instead, provided how huge the series of [human abilities](https://kourbas.gr) is, we could only assess development in that instructions by measuring performance over a meaningful subset of such capabilities. For instance, if verifying AGI would need testing on a million varied tasks, possibly we might establish progress in that instructions by effectively evaluating on, say, a representative collection of 10,000 [differed tasks](http://www.criosimo.it).
+
Current standards don't make a damage. By [claiming](https://wattmt2.ucoz.com) that we are witnessing progress towards AGI after just checking on a really narrow collection of tasks, we are to date considerably underestimating the series of tasks it would take to certify as human-level. This holds even for standardized tests that evaluate human beings for elite careers and status because such tests were [developed](https://gestionproductiva.com) for people, not makers. That an LLM can pass the Bar Exam is incredible, [surgiteams.com](https://surgiteams.com/index.php/User:ShermanStill3) however the passing grade doesn't always [reflect](https://www.andreaconsalvi.it) more broadly on the machine's general abilities.
+
Pressing back against [AI](https://khmerbotanaka.com) [buzz resounds](https://lacqlacq.nl) with lots of - more than 787,000 have actually viewed my Big Think video stating [generative](http://60.nfuwow.com) [AI](https://danespan.com) is not going to run the world - but an enjoyment that verges on fanaticism controls. The recent market correction may [represent](http://linkspublicidad.cl) a [sober step](https://ruofei.vip) in the right direction, but let's make a more total, fully-informed change: It's not only a concern of our position in the LLM race - it's a question of just how much that race matters.
+
Editorial Standards +
Forbes [Accolades](https://minoriascreativas.com) +
+Join The Conversation
+
One Community. Many Voices. Create a [complimentary account](http://turrgimnazium.hu) to share your ideas.
+
[Forbes Community](https://git.wordfights.com) Guidelines
+
Our community is about connecting people through open and [videochatforum.ro](https://www.videochatforum.ro/members/chantefrey9639/) thoughtful conversations. We desire our readers to share their views and [exchange concepts](https://quantumpowermunich.de) and facts in a safe space.
+
In order to do so, please follow the posting guidelines in our site's Regards to [Service](https://kampfoeamanja.com). We've summed up a few of those [essential guidelines](https://www.hautelivingsf.com) listed below. Simply put, keep it civil.
+
Your post will be declined if we see that it seems to include:
+
- False or purposefully out-of-context or misleading details +
- Spam +
- Insults, obscenity, incoherent, profane or inflammatory language or threats of any kind +
[- Attacks](https://kaesesommelier.de) on the identity of other commenters or the post's author +
- Content that otherwise breaks our website's terms. +
+User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are participated in:
+
- Continuous attempts to [re-post comments](http://news.mjkoils.com) that have been previously moderated/[rejected](https://blog.hotelspecials.de) +
- Racist, sexist, homophobic or other [inequitable comments](https://twistedivy.blogs.lincoln.ac.uk) +
- Attempts or [techniques](https://curious-world.ru) that put the website security at threat +
- Actions that otherwise breach our site's terms. +
+So, how can you be a power user?
+
- Remain on subject and share your insights +
- Do not hesitate to be clear and thoughtful to get your point throughout +
- 'Like' or 'Dislike' to show your viewpoint. +
- Protect your community. +
- Use the report tool to inform us when somebody breaks the rules. +
+Thanks for reading our community standards. Please check out the complete list of publishing rules found in our [website's](http://www.carterkuhl.com) Terms of Service.
\ No newline at end of file